Back
This section is aimed at students in upper secondary education in the Danish school system, some objects will be simplified some details will be omitted.

Real Numbers \(\mathbb{R}\)

Some of the first numbers discovered were the "counting" numbers, or the non-negative whole numbers, denoted by \(\mathbb{N}\) and with these we can add numbers and we can multiply numbers without issues.
At some point in history, people wanted to be able to denote negative numbers also so we added the negative whole numbers yielding all the whole numbers, denoted by \(\mathbb{Z}\supset\mathbb{N}\) and this allowed us to do the opposite of addition and subtract numbers without running into issues.
As you may have guessed, at some point it became necessary to be able to do the opposite thing of multiplication, division, and the rational numbers were born, denoted by \(\mathbb{Q}\supset\mathbb{Z}\supset\mathbb{N}\). These numbers can be represented as two whole numbers divided by each other or as decimal numbers with repeating digits, i.e. at some point the same sequence of digits will repeat infinitely.
Now this is a powerful set and you can pretty much do anything with these numbers, but being notorious sticklers for details, mathematicians required more precision, in fact infinite precision, and the real numbers emerged, denoted by \(\mathbb{R}\supset\mathbb{Q}\supset\mathbb{Z}\supset\mathbb{N}\). These are represented by decimal numbers with any number of non-repeating digits, also infinitely many, and some examples of real numbers that have infinitely many non-repeating digits are \(\pi\), Euler's number and the golden ratio, impractically precise numbers with extremely beautiful and useful properties.

Complex Numbers \(\mathbb{C}\)

Now many of you probably thought the story ended there, but it did in fact not. New problems emerged, one being that some polynomials didn't have any roots, e.g. \(p(x)=x^2+1\). If it did have a root it would have the property that \(x^2=-1\) which is not true for any real number. These issues caused mathematicians to consider the complex numbers, denoted by \(\mathbb{C}\supset\mathbb{R}\supset\mathbb{Q}\supset\mathbb{Z}\supset\mathbb{N}\).

Cartesian Form

These numbers can be represented in the so called "Cartesian" form \(a+ib\), where \(a,b\in\mathbb{R}\). We say that a is the "real part" and b is the "imaginary part" which is recognizable by that weird "i" which is called the "imaginary unit" which is the solution to our previous polynomial since it has the property that \(i^2=-1\). This can be represented visually as a point in 2D space with a as the "x-coordinate" and b as the "y-coordinate" which in effect means that we have two coordinate axes where one of them is "real" and the other is "imaginary". Note that these are just names and not properties, imaginary numbers have multiple properties that suggest they are just as real as any other number.

Multiplication

These numbers have every property of real numbers, so we can do the exact same operations on these as the real numbers, the only difference is that we have the imaginary unit which squares to -1. This means that we can multiply complex numbers and get a new complex numbers, which is a benefit over vectors since the canonical "multiplication" of vectors yields a scalar, i.e. changes the object type. So lets demonstrate how you multiply two complex numbers by using the normal rules of multiplication: $$(a+ib)(c+id)=ac+aid+ibc+ibid=ac+iad+ibc+i^2bd=ac-bd+i(ad+bc)$$

Unit Circle

Lets pull back and restrict ourselves to the unit circle, i.e. we will consider complex numbers of the form \(f(x)=\cos(x)+i\sin(x)\) where x is the arc length from the real axis. This in fact is a function of arc length which allows us to differentiate it, $$f'(x)=-\sin(x)+i\cos(x)=i^2\sin(x)+i\cos(x)=i(\cos(x)+i\sin(x)=if(x)$$ This means that f has the property that \(f'=cf\) where \(c=i\) and there is only one function that has this property, namely the natural exponential function \(f(x)=ce^{ix}\) but \(c=f(0)=cos(0)+i\sin(0)=1\) which means that $$e^{ix}=\cos(x)+i\sin(x)$$ which in turn yields arguably the most beautiful formula in all of math $$e^{i\pi}=\cos(\pi)+i\sin(\pi)=-1+i\cdot0\implies e^{i\pi}+1=0$$ This is not the only immediately interesting consequence of that result, another is that if we take two numbers on the unit circle and multiply them we get \begin{align} e^{i\theta}e^{i\varphi}&=(\cos(\theta)+i\sin(\theta))(cos(\varphi)+i\sin(\varphi))\\ e^{i(\theta+\varphi)}&=\cos(\theta)\cos(\varphi)-\sin(\theta)\sin(\varphi) +i(\cos(\theta)\sin(\varphi)+\sin(\theta)\cos(\varphi))\\ &=\cos(\theta+\varphi)+i\sin(\theta+\varphi) \end{align} which means that $$\cos(\theta+\varphi)=\cos(\theta)\cos(\varphi)-\sin(\theta)\sin(\varphi)$$ and $$\sin(\theta+\varphi)=\cos(\theta)\sin(\varphi)+\sin(\theta)\cos(\varphi)$$

Polar Form

Any complex number, \(z=a+ib\), can then be written as a unit number \(e^{i\theta}\) multiplied by its magnitude \(|z|=r=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}\), i.e. \(z=|z|e^{i\theta}=re^{i\theta}\) and this is called the "polar form".

Complex Conjugate and Division

For every complex number \(z=a+ib\) there is another complex number called it's conjugate \(\bar{z}=a-ib\) which is just \(z\) reflected by the real axis. We can use the conjugate to define complex division in the following way. We consider the product \(z\bar{z}=(a+ib)(a-ib)=a^2-(ib)^2=a^2+b^2=|z|^2\) which means that $$z\frac{\bar{z}}{|z|^2}=1\implies z^{-1}=\frac{\bar{z}}{|z|^2}$$ This means that in order to "divide" by the complex number \(z\) we need to multiply by \(\frac{\bar{z}}{|z|^2}\)